{"id":3135,"date":"2015-02-10T00:34:27","date_gmt":"2015-02-10T06:34:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/?p=3135"},"modified":"2015-02-10T00:34:27","modified_gmt":"2015-02-10T06:34:27","slug":"dr-h-p-murray-vs-e-f-hallsey-1890","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/dr-h-p-murray-vs-e-f-hallsey-1890\/","title":{"rendered":"Dr. H.P. Murray vs. E.F. Hallsey (1890)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Dr. H.P. MURRAY<\/strong>, of Plymouth, brought suit against <strong>B.F. HALLSEY<\/strong>, of Roper, on Monday last, alleging that the defendant had spoken of and concerning him the following false slanderous and malicious language: \u201cThat <strong>Dr. H.P. MURRAY<\/strong> is not a safe practitioner; that <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> is no gentleman, and does not know as much about medicine as my old horse; that <strong>MURRAY<\/strong> is not fit to practice medicine; that if <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> had anything to do with an operation for strangulated hernia on one <strong>Charles ALLEN<\/strong>, said <strong>ALLEN<\/strong> would certainly die.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The case was called for trial before <strong>Justice J.S. CHESSON<\/strong> on Tuesday at 2 o\u2019clock pm. <strong>B.F. HALLSEY<\/strong> appeared and plead guilty to all the charges except the last.<\/p>\n<p>The following witnesses testified for the plaintiff: <strong>Wm. H. DAILY<\/strong> testified that he had heard <strong>B.F. HALLSEY<\/strong> say on one occasion that <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> gave a prescription, which, had the druggist filled it and the patient taken the medicine, would have produced death; that he had heard <strong>B.F. HALLSEY<\/strong> say that other men who knew nothing of medicine, knew as much as <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong>; that <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> makes these assertions publicly everywhere and anywhere, and has been doing so for the last three months. On cross-examination by <strong>Dr. HALLSEY<\/strong> this witness asked if he heard the defendant say anything about the <strong>ALLEN<\/strong> case; witness answered: \u201cI heard you say <strong>ALLEN<\/strong> would die.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>J.W. GAYLORD<\/strong>, a witness for the plaintiff, testified; \u201cI have heard <strong>B.F. HALLSEY<\/strong> say that<strong> Dr. WARD<\/strong> did not recognize <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> as a physician.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Dr. S. HASSELL<\/strong>, of Roper, a witness for the plaintiff, testified that he had talked with <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> frequently, and had heard <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> make sleight remarks about MURRAY. That he did not think the defendant had been friendly towards the plaintiff for at least a year. That after the operation on <strong>ALLEN<\/strong> had been performed he met <strong>HALLSEY,<\/strong> and was asked by <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> if the operation had been performed and who did it, and on being told by <strong>Dr. HASSELL<\/strong> that it had been, and that Dr. MURRAY did it, <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> said, sarcastically, he, (<strong>ALLEN)<\/strong>, will die. That since the bringing of this action <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> has attempted to explain that he meant that <strong>ALLEN<\/strong> would die, not because <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> performed the operation, but because it had been performed. <strong>Dr. HASSELL<\/strong> further testified that <strong>Dr. MURRAY\u2019s<\/strong> standing in the Medical Association of North Carolina was good &#8211; No. 1. That <strong>Dr. HALLSEY<\/strong> was not a member of the Medical Association, but attended the meeting of the State Medical Examining Board at Elizabeth City last year for the purpose of obtaining a license from said Board. On his return home <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> said: \u201cI got through, but .\u201d This closed the testimony for the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p>The defendant offered no evidence.<\/p>\n<p>The case was argued by <strong>Mr. A.O. GAYLORD<\/strong>, for the plaintiff. No counsel for the defendant.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mr. GAYLORD<\/strong> argued that the language used by <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> in the presence of <strong>Mr. DAILY<\/strong> and many others, was slanderous per se. That it was the duty of <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> to sustain the charge he had made against <strong>MURRAY<\/strong>, and failing, as he does in this case to produce any evidence to sustain them, he simply admits not only that he made the charges, but also that they were both false and malicious. That <strong>HALLSEY\u2019s<\/strong> assertions that <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> knew nothing about medicine, and had given a prescription that would have produced death, was language that no man ought to use, unless he was prepared to sustain the charge, and when <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong> admits that the charge is false, that Dr. MURRAY in fact never gave any such prescription, he, <strong>HALLSEY<\/strong>, deserve more punishment than this court, or any other court, can inflict under law, as it now is.<\/p>\n<p>That such language is malicious, there can be no doubt, and deserves the condemnation of this court, and of the entire country.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Mr. GAYLORD<\/strong> further argued that the testimony of <strong>Dr. HASSELL<\/strong> showed conclusively that <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> is preemintely worthy of the confidence of the people, and that the language used by <strong>Dr. HALLSEY<\/strong> could not damage him, except in communities where he was not known. That the object of this action is not to collect money out of <strong>HALLSEY,<\/strong> but to force him to admit before the public, that the charges he had made against <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong> were false and malicious. This has been accomplished, and <strong>Dr. HALLSEY<\/strong> stands convicted before the court and the country on a winful and malicious attack upon the professional character of <strong>Dr. MURRAY<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, <strong>Mr. GAYLORD<\/strong> said that the plaintiff would not ask the court for judgment against the defendant but for only one cent, as Dr. MURRAY would not, under any circumstances, receive money from the defendant as a punishment for the wrong done him.<\/p>\n<p>The court then rendered judgement against the defendant for one cent and costs, as demanded by plaintiff.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Source: Roanoke Beacon, 25\u00a0July\u00a01890, pg 3.\u00a0<em>Available online at\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.digitalnc.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">digitalnc.org<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dr. H.P. MURRAY, of Plymouth, brought suit against B.F. HALLSEY, of Roper, on Monday last, alleging that the defendant had spoken of and concerning him the following false slanderous and malicious language: \u201cThat Dr. H.P. MURRAY is not a safe practitioner; that Dr. MURRAY is no gentleman, and does not know as much about medicine [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1025,77],"tags":[2808,2809,1490,2810,2807,89,1420],"class_list":["post-3135","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-roanoke-beacon","category-washington","tag-chesson-j-s-justice","tag-daily-wm-h","tag-gaylord-a-o","tag-gaylord-j-w","tag-hallsey-b-f","tag-hassell-s-dr","tag-murray-h-p-dr"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4CY8G-Oz","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3135","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3135"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3135\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3136,"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3135\/revisions\/3136"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3135"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3135"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ncgenweb-data.com\/histnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3135"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}